Economic red flags

Economic red flags refer to potential weaknesses in a DeFi protocol’s economic or financial design, rather than its smart contract security. In simple terms, these are issues in the way money flows or incentives are structured, which could lead to financial losses even if the underlying code functions correctly.

Shift maintains a detailed checklist of these red flags, developed by analyzing historical failures in the DeFi market. This checklist helps Shift proactively identify economic risks for any asset or protocol it considers for investment.

If a project has an economic red flag, it signals a known vulnerability or flaw in the project's design, potentially leading to exploitation or breakdown. Shift uses these flags to either avoid risky investments or put extra safeguards, like trigger systems, in place to protect investors.

Many DeFi incidents aren't due to code exploits, but arise because of economic vulnerabilities—such as liquidity issues or market manipulations—that the original developers hadn't anticipated. That’s why Shift closely examines the economic stability and incentives of every protocol.

Overview of economic red flags

The following table outlines some common economic risks that Shift evaluates:

Vector

Red flag

Key question to assess risk

Max rating

Prior Exploits

This Protocol Economic Exploits

Has this protocol ever suffered an economic exploit?

A

Prior Exploits

This Protocol Technical Exploit

Has this protocol ever suffered a technical exploit?

A

Prior Exploits

Fork Protocols Economic Exploits

Have any forks of this protocol experienced economic exploits?

AAA

Prior Exploits

Fork Protocols Technical Exploits

Have any forks of this protocol experienced technical exploits?

AAA

DAO

Malicious DAO Decisions

Can any DAO decisions potentially lead to loss of funds?

AAA

DAO

DAO Democracy

Does any single entity control a majority of DAO votes?

A

DAO

DAO Decisions Implementation

Is there a time delay or buffer before DAO decisions take effect?

A

Lending

Unapproved Assets

Are all collateral assets included in the approved asset list?

BBB

Lending

Collateral Factor

Is the collateral factor for non-stable assets at least 0.825?

A

Lending

Borrow to Supply Ratio

Is the borrow-to-supply ratio below 60%?

AA

Lending

Market Liquidators

Are liquidations carried out by independent, third-party actors?

BB

Stablecoins

Algorithmic Model

If using stablecoins beyond USDC/USDT, is the peg maintained without algorithmic mechanisms?

A

Stablecoins

Collateral

Can the stablecoin withstand more than a 2% depeg from market volatility?

A

Stablecoins

Collateral Security

If using non-USDC/USDT stablecoins, is their collateral never reinvested?

BBB

Stablecoins

Redemption

Is redemption of non-USDC/USDT stablecoins always available?

BBB

Stablecoins

Centralisation

Is the stablecoin free from centralization risks?

BBB

Price Oracle Issue

Price Oracle

Is a trusted price oracle (like Chainlink) being used?

A

Price Oracle Issue

True price from price oracle

Are oracle prices based on live market data, not hardcoded values?

AA

Practical example: economic checks for Aave V3 Ethereum

When Shift evaluates Aave V3 Ethereum, a lending protocol, it carefully examines specific risk vectors:

DAO structure

Two main risks are flagged here:

  • Malicious DAO decisions

  • DAO democracy (concentration of voting power)

Both risks are addressed by implementing triggers that actively monitor all DAO proposals, reducing their impact.

Lending risks

Shift evaluates critical lending risks, including:

  • Unapproved assets: A red flag here triggers automated liquidation monitoring during market volatility.

  • Collateral factor: If the collateral factor is insufficient, another trigger monitors liquidation health.

  • Borrow-to-supply ratio: Shift checks this ratio to ensure borrowing remains sustainable.

  • Independent liquidators: The presence of multiple independent liquidators (verified via Dune Analytics) confirms the market's robustness.

Price oracle risks

Because accurate pricing is essential, Shift identifies any risks around oracles. Although Aave V3 Ethereum mostly relies on reliable Chainlink oracles, some prices are hardcoded—potentially increasing risk. Shift sets specific triggers to closely monitor these situations.

In summary, although several red flags are identified for Aave V3 Ethereum, each one is carefully managed by Shift's proactive trigger system. Thus, despite these flags, the economic risks are well controlled and do not negatively impact Aave’s overall risk rating.

Last updated