Economic red flags
Economic red flags refer to potential weaknesses in a DeFi protocol’s economic or financial design, rather than its smart contract security. In simple terms, these are issues in the way money flows or incentives are structured, which could lead to financial losses even if the underlying code functions correctly.
Shift maintains a detailed checklist of these red flags, developed by analyzing historical failures in the DeFi market. This checklist helps Shift proactively identify economic risks for any asset or protocol it considers for investment.
If a project has an economic red flag, it signals a known vulnerability or flaw in the project's design, potentially leading to exploitation or breakdown. Shift uses these flags to either avoid risky investments or put extra safeguards, like trigger systems, in place to protect investors.
Many DeFi incidents aren't due to code exploits, but arise because of economic vulnerabilities—such as liquidity issues or market manipulations—that the original developers hadn't anticipated. That’s why Shift closely examines the economic stability and incentives of every protocol.
Overview of economic red flags
The following table outlines some common economic risks that Shift evaluates:
Vector
Red flag
Key question to assess risk
Max rating
Prior Exploits
This Protocol Economic Exploits
Has this protocol ever suffered an economic exploit?
A
Prior Exploits
This Protocol Technical Exploit
Has this protocol ever suffered a technical exploit?
A
Prior Exploits
Fork Protocols Economic Exploits
Have any forks of this protocol experienced economic exploits?
AAA
Prior Exploits
Fork Protocols Technical Exploits
Have any forks of this protocol experienced technical exploits?
AAA
DAO
Malicious DAO Decisions
Can any DAO decisions potentially lead to loss of funds?
AAA
DAO
DAO Democracy
Does any single entity control a majority of DAO votes?
A
DAO
DAO Decisions Implementation
Is there a time delay or buffer before DAO decisions take effect?
A
Lending
Unapproved Assets
Are all collateral assets included in the approved asset list?
BBB
Lending
Collateral Factor
Is the collateral factor for non-stable assets at least 0.825?
A
Lending
Borrow to Supply Ratio
Is the borrow-to-supply ratio below 60%?
AA
Lending
Market Liquidators
Are liquidations carried out by independent, third-party actors?
BB
Stablecoins
Algorithmic Model
If using stablecoins beyond USDC/USDT, is the peg maintained without algorithmic mechanisms?
A
Stablecoins
Collateral
Can the stablecoin withstand more than a 2% depeg from market volatility?
A
Stablecoins
Collateral Security
If using non-USDC/USDT stablecoins, is their collateral never reinvested?
BBB
Stablecoins
Redemption
Is redemption of non-USDC/USDT stablecoins always available?
BBB
Stablecoins
Centralisation
Is the stablecoin free from centralization risks?
BBB
Price Oracle Issue
Price Oracle
Is a trusted price oracle (like Chainlink) being used?
A
Price Oracle Issue
True price from price oracle
Are oracle prices based on live market data, not hardcoded values?
AA
Practical example: economic checks for Aave V3 Ethereum
When Shift evaluates Aave V3 Ethereum, a lending protocol, it carefully examines specific risk vectors:
DAO structure
Two main risks are flagged here:
Malicious DAO decisions
DAO democracy (concentration of voting power)
Both risks are addressed by implementing triggers that actively monitor all DAO proposals, reducing their impact.
Lending risks
Shift evaluates critical lending risks, including:
Unapproved assets: A red flag here triggers automated liquidation monitoring during market volatility.
Collateral factor: If the collateral factor is insufficient, another trigger monitors liquidation health.
Borrow-to-supply ratio: Shift checks this ratio to ensure borrowing remains sustainable.
Independent liquidators: The presence of multiple independent liquidators (verified via Dune Analytics) confirms the market's robustness.
Price oracle risks
Because accurate pricing is essential, Shift identifies any risks around oracles. Although Aave V3 Ethereum mostly relies on reliable Chainlink oracles, some prices are hardcoded—potentially increasing risk. Shift sets specific triggers to closely monitor these situations.
In summary, although several red flags are identified for Aave V3 Ethereum, each one is carefully managed by Shift's proactive trigger system. Thus, despite these flags, the economic risks are well controlled and do not negatively impact Aave’s overall risk rating.
Last updated